Pedagogical PerspectivePedPer • ISSN: 2822-4841 • Open Access • Double-Blind Review
Manuscript Evaluation Form
⚿ Confidential Peer Review

Manuscript Evaluation Form

Confidential Peer Review — Double-Blind Process. Complete all sections and provide detailed, constructive comments. The completed Word document will be downloaded automatically and a copy sent to the editorial office and your email. A general notification (without confidential details) will be sent to the corresponding author.

1
Info
2
Evaluation
3
Comments
4
Decision
5
Sign-off
01 — Manuscript InformationSubmission details
Required.
Required.
Required.
Valid email required.
02 — Dear ReviewerPlease read

Dear Colleague,

Please review the attached manuscript submitted to Pedagogical Perspective as a potential publication. This is a double-blind peer review: neither your identity nor the authors' identities are disclosed.

Please complete all sections of this form and provide detailed, constructive comments — even if the article is not publishable in your opinion. Your expertise directly improves the quality of scholarship in this field.

If you are unable to review this manuscript for any reason (conflict of interest, time constraints, or expertise mismatch), please decline immediately via your reviewer dashboard.

Sincerely, The Editors — Pedagogical Perspective

03 — Rating Scale KeyReference codes
A
Acceptable
Meets or exceeds expectations
P
Poor
Below expectations; requires significant improvement
U
Unacceptable
Fails minimum standard
N/O
Not Observed
Cannot be assessed from submission
N/A
Not Applicable
Does not apply to this article type
04 — Criterion Evaluation TableRate each criterion
Rate each criterion using the codes above. Add notes especially for Poor or Unacceptable ratings. Click a domain header to expand/collapse.
05 — Detailed Reviewer CommentsConstructive & specific
Comments to the author should be constructive, specific, and actionable. Confidential comments to the editor may include your overall assessment and recommendation rationale.
06 — Recommended Editorial DecisionAdvisory — final decision rests with editor
✅
ACCEPT
No revision required
✏️
MINOR REVISION
Accept after minor revisions (no re-review)
🔄
MAJOR REVISION
Revise and resubmit — mandatory re-review
⛔
REJECT
Does not meet publication standards
Please select a recommendation.
07 — Reviewer Declaration & Sign-offDouble-blind — name optional
⚿ Reviewer identity is protected under double-blind review. Name and ORCID are optional. The declaration of no conflict of interest is mandatory.
Valid email required.
Declaration: I confirm that I have no conflict of interest with this manuscript and that my review is impartial and independent.
Please fill in all required fields.
✅

Evaluation Submitted!

Your Manuscript Evaluation Form has been downloaded. A confirmation has been sent to and the editorial office. A general notification has been sent to the corresponding author.

Please also upload the .docx via your reviewer dashboard.

Pedagogical Perspective (PedPer) • Manuscript Evaluation Form • Confidential — upload via reviewer dashboard